← Journal
The Reflection · Stefan van de Brug · 2 min read 🇳🇱 NL

The myth of talent

What we call talent is usually something else.

A student of mine picked up something in a couple of weeks that takes most people months. A parent watching said it right away: “She’s just got talent.” I nodded — it’s a kind thing to say, and you don’t really want to correct a compliment in front of the kid. But something nagged at me, because I knew what the parent didn’t. This kid had been playing guitar for years. She read rhythm without thinking about it. There was always an instrument lying around the house. What looked like talent was mostly a head start.

I get why we love the word. It explains everything in one go — why one student flies and another crawls — and lets us stop looking. But that’s the problem, really. “Talent” makes the difference sound like something you’re born with, when nearly always it’s something that got built: earlier experience, a musical home, hundreds of hours nobody ever counted.

I’m not saying aptitude doesn’t exist. People are different, musically too. But in an actual lesson it matters far less than we think. Almost every time I meet a “talented” student, I find an invisible step up somewhere. A parent who sang. An instrument before this one. A stretch where practising didn’t feel like practising, because it was still just playing.

And the reverse is just as telling. The students we quietly file under “not very musical” are usually the ones starting from zero — no instrument at home, nobody to play with, no head start to mistake for a gift. Give them the same months the “talented” kid already had behind them, and most of them get there too. Slower, sometimes. But there.

Here’s the part that bothers me most: the word quietly discourages. Tell a student that someone else has talent, and what they also hear is that they don’t. If it all comes down to what you’re born with — why bother trying? A compliment to one kid becomes a brake on the next, and nobody notices it happen.

So I’ve changed the words I use. Not what a student is — what they did. “You clearly put the time in this week.” “You’re hearing that faster than you were a month ago.” “Last month that bar fell apart every time; today it held.” It’s not flattery — it’s just more accurate. And it points at something they actually hold in their own hands.

Maybe talent is mostly a story we tell about a process we never got to watch. The real question is what changes in your lessons the day you stop letting that story off the hook.

Talent is usually just a head start nobody watched happen.